Comments on: No smoker? A $80 grill is enough for tasty pulled pork. http://cooking.blogoverflow.com/2012/09/no-smoker-a-80-grill-is-enough-for-tasty-pulled-pork/ The Seasoned Advice Bolg Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:02:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.6 By: Henry http://cooking.blogoverflow.com/2012/09/no-smoker-a-80-grill-is-enough-for-tasty-pulled-pork/#comment-183234 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:02:38 +0000 http://cooking.blogoverflow.com/?p=1061#comment-183234 I actually try to keep my temperature around 225. I use a charcoal holder instead of the ring but I have to open the lid every hour. I think I am going to try the ring of coals instead. Thanks

]]> By: Wilton http://cooking.blogoverflow.com/2012/09/no-smoker-a-80-grill-is-enough-for-tasty-pulled-pork/#comment-20355 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:57:32 +0000 http://cooking.blogoverflow.com/?p=1061#comment-20355 I tried the snake method for the first time with a 3.5 lb boneless pork roast (rubbed). I used 44 unlit briquettes and six lit coals along with three bundles of applewood chips in my 20 year old Webber kettle. I got a three hour burn at 225 – 250 degrees throughout. The roast was cooked to perfection with a nice crust. I let it rest in foil for about half an hour.

My wife is STILL raving about it.

]]> By: yossarian http://cooking.blogoverflow.com/2012/09/no-smoker-a-80-grill-is-enough-for-tasty-pulled-pork/#comment-658 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:52:44 +0000 http://cooking.blogoverflow.com/?p=1061#comment-658 Doing the ring of coals is a really clever idea. I wish I’d seen this 5 years ago when I was still smoking on a Webber.

]]>